Urge Congress to
defend English
Your Congressmen
Current Legislation
State Profiles
Petition
Official
English
Bilingual
Education
English
on the Job
Citizenship
and
Immigration
Bilingual
Ballots
Puerto Rican
Statehood
Ending E.O.
13166,
the "Multilingual
Mandate"
Model
official
English statute
Backgrounders
Pending legislation
Census
2000 data
Myths
& Facts
Poll Data
Contact us:
1601 N. Kent St.
Suite 1100
Arlington, VA
22209
ph: (703)816-8821
|
|
ELA Hails Supreme
Court Decision to Rule on
Official English
English Language Advocates
News Release
Sept. 27, 2000
The head of English Language Advocates (ELA) hailed yesterday's announcement
that the Supreme Court has agreed to hear Alexander v. Sandoval (case
no. 99-1908), a case of enormous importance to the official English
movement. ELA is a national organization that advocates for official
English laws nationally and at the state level, and has specialized
in defending such laws in court.
Martha Sandoval, a non-English speaking resident alien from Mexico,
brought suit against the state of Alabama charging that the state's
policy of giving its drivers' license exams only in English constitutes
national origin discrimination and is therefore illegal under Title
VI of the civil rights law. The US Justice Department joined the suit
on behalf of the plaintiff and won decisions at district and court
of appeals levels. Alabama, which changed its drivers' license policy
after voters passed an official English initiative by a 9 to 1 margin
in 1990, had appealed the lower court rulings to the Supreme Court.
ELA Executive Director K.C. McAlpin said that the case will give the
high court the opportunity to decide on at least two questions of
major significance to the country's language policies: (1) whether
the federal government and federal agencies can expand civil rights
laws by simply issuing regulations, and (2) whether the Clinton Administration
can redefine "national origin discrimination" under Title VI of the
civil rights law to include the failure of a federal (or federally
funded) agency to provide services in any foreign language on demand.
The Clinton Administration has already cited the Sandoval lower court
decision as grounds for issuing Executive Order 13166, August 11th
that requires all federal agencies to provide meaningful access to
their services in any language used by a non-English speaking client.
"Hopefully, those of us who believe in the constitutional separation
of powers will find out whether the Clinton Administration can continue
transforming this country into a modern version of the Tower of Babel
without the consent of the American people. It's time for the Supreme
Court to tell this Administration that we are not yet a government
of arbitrary rule," he added.
The Supreme Court put the case on a fast track with oral arguments
expected as early as January. McAlpin said that ELA would file a legal
brief supporting Alabama.
For more information contact:
K.C. McAlpin, (703) 816-8821
|
|