Urge Congress to
defend English
Your Congressmen
Current Legislation
State Profiles
Official English
Bilingual Education
English on the Job
Citizenship and
Immigration
Bilingual Ballots
Puerto Rican
Statehood
Ending E.O. 13166,
the "Multilingual Mandate"
Model official
English statute
Backgrounders
Pending legislation
Census 2000 data
Myths & Facts
Poll Data
Contact us:
1601 N. Kent St.
Suite 1100
Arlington, VA
22209
ph: (703)816-8821
|
|
In
a major victory for the pro-English movement, the United States Supreme
Court has ruled that Marta Sandoval cannot sue the
state of Alabama to overturn its official English laws.
The court had heard arguments this January in the
case of Sandoval v. Alexander. ProEnglish filed an amicus curiae ("friend
of the court") brief, arguing that the state of Alabama had the right
to require that drivers' license exams be conducted in English. Joining
ProEnglish as sponsors of the brief were the Center for American Unity,
the English First Foundation and fourteen members of Congress, listed
below.
In 1996, Martha Sandoval, a Spanish-speaking resident
alien from Mexico, sued the state alleging Alabama's policy constituted
"national origin discrimination" under Title VI of the Civil Rights
law. She won decisions at the district and appeals court levels.
Under the lower court's interpretation, failure to provide benefits
or services in foreign languages constitutes discrimination on the
basis of national origin.
Although Sandoval was decided on the
narrow issue of whether or not an individual can sue a government
agency over alleged discrimination, the majority decision reverses
lower court decisions that sought to nullify Alabama's official English
law. Moreover, had it not been
overturned, Sandoval would have created a new entitlement to
government services in any foreign language demanded. "This is a great
victory for common sense, democracy, and the rule of law," said ProEnglish
executive director K.C. McAlpin.
"The repeated,
lop-sided victory of official English laws on the ballot in many states
over the last twenty years, shows clearly that the American people
have no desire to see their country transformed into a multi-lingual
'Tower of Babel' by multicultural advocates and judicial activists,"
he added. McAlpin called
on Congress to settle the issue of language once and for all by passing
a law declaring English the official language of government in the
United States.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case
on an expedited schedule, allowing the case to be heard in this session.
ProEnglish's brief was co-sponsored by Reps. Thomas Tancredo (R-CO),
Spencer Bachus (R-AL), Bob Barr (R-GA), John Doolittle (R-CA), Bob
Goodlatte (R-VA), Ernest Istook (R-OK), Joe Knollenberg (R-MI), William
Lipinski (D-IL), Charlie Norwood (R-GA), Ron Paul (R-TX), Bob Riley
(R-AL), Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA), Nick Smith (R-MI), and Bob Stump
(R-AZ).
U.S. Supreme Court's decision
ProEnglish's amicus brief
|
|